THE PRIMACY OF PARTICIPATION.
THE CRITIQUE, DEVELOPMENT AND REDESIGN OF ETIENNE WENGER’S SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34813/11coll2026Słowa kluczowe:
Etienne Wenger, social learning theory, learning theory, primacy of participation, epistemology, communities of practiseAbstrakt
The social learning theory presented by Etienne Wenger is referred to as one of the most cited contemporary learning theories (Fejes & Nylander, 2015; Dingyloudi & Strijbos, 2020). This paper first outlines the development of Wenger’s social learning theory with an overview of central elements in the theory. Focusing on the epistemological substructure of Wenger’s theory, the presentation outlines three main areas of critique that the theory has met: a) transformative learning (DePalma, 2009), b) the context for learning in the 21st century (Engeström, 2007), and c) the primacy of participation (Lövgren, 2017). Two redesigns of Wenger’s initial theory are presented in answer to the first two areas of critique (DePalma, 2009, Wenger-Trayner, 2015). The third area of critique puts focus on Wenger’s depiction of the “duality of meaning” (Wenger, 1998, p.55). Responding to the epistemological presumptions behind Wenger’s description of reification and participation as reciprocal, I have postulated “the Primacy of Participation”. To illustrate the centrality of this critique for social science research, the paper ends by referring to the inceptory role participation is given in the development of contemporary social science research.
Bibliografia
Afdal, G. (2013). Religion som bevegelse: Læring, kunnskap og mediering. (Religion as movement: Learning, knowledge and mediation). Universitetsforlaget.
Afrol News. (2004). Desmond Tutu “pained” by Ugandan Church. African News Agency. http://www.afrol.com/articles/11404
Barton, D., Tusting, K. (2005). Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554
Blackmore, C. (2010). Social learning systems and communities of practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2
Blikstad-Balas, M. (2014). Vague concepts in the educational sciences: Implications for researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.773558
Brannan, M.J. (2007). Sexuality, gender and legitimate peripheral participation. In: Cambridge, D., Wenger-Trayner, E., Hammer, P., Reid, P., & Wilson, L. (2024). Theoretical and practical principles for generative AI in communities of practice and social learning. In Framing futures in postdigital education: Critical concepts for data-driven practices (pp. 229–239).
Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58622-4_13
Cetina, K.K., Schatzki, T.R., Von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2005). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
Cox, A.M. (2005) What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505057016
DePalma, R. (2009). Leaving Alinsu: Towards a transformative community of practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(4), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030902818394
Dingyloudi, F., Strijbos, J-W. (2020). Community Representations in Learning Communities.
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(7), 1052–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1640788
Engeström, Y. (2007). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In Hughes, J., Jewson, N.,
Unwin, L. (Eds). Communities of Practice: Critical Perspectives (pp. 41–54). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/NOE0415364737.ch4
Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: A conversation with Etienne Wenger. British journal of educational studies, 64(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799
Fejes, A., Nylander, E. (2015). How pluralistic is the research field on adult education? Dominating bibliometrical trends, 2005-2012. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 6(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9063
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503
Fuller, A. (2013). Critiquing theories of learning and communities of practice. In Hughes, J., Jewson, N. Unwin, L. (Eds). Communities of practice, critical perspectives (pp. 27–39). Routledge.
Honneth, A. (2008). Reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford University Press.
Grundtvig, N. F. S. (2011). The School for Life: NFS Grundtvig on Education for the People. Aarhus University Press
Guile, D. (2006). Learning Across Contexts. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00193.x
Hannington, M., Govender, L. (2024). Communities of practice: A decolonial critique. Clinical Teacher, 21(3), e13699. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13699 https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1452288
Hughes, J., Jewson, N. Unwin, L. (Eds). (2007). Communities of Practice: Critical Perspectives. Routledge.
Katalog für die Bibliotheken der Universität Heidelberg, https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/titel.cgi?katkey=68728331. [29.10.2025]
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of management review, 31(4), 833–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527456
Lave, J., Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lissillour, R., Silva, M. E. (2024). Going forward and beyond: on the track of a practice turn in supply chain sustainability studies. RAUSP Management Journal, 59(2), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-09-2023-0181
Lövgren, J. (2017). Community, Self and the Other: Learning Processes in Norwegian Folk High Schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MF Norwegian School of Theology.
Lövgren, J. (2019). Community Self and Other: Learning Processes in Norvegian Folk High Schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(5), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1452288
Lövgren, J. (2022). From Nation Building to Global Citizenship: Human Rights Education in the Nordic Folk High Schools, Human Rights Education Review, 5:2, 77–97, https://doir.org/10.7577/hrer.4470
Lövgren, J. (2023). Identity development in higher education: teacher’s training informed by folk high school pedagogy. Reflective practice research in higher education pedagogies, 2, 53.
Lövgren, J. (in print). Outlining an epistemology for civic education. In J. Lövgren et al. Perspectives on the Global Folk High School Movement and People’s Future Lab
Lövgren, J., Murphy, D. J. (2025). Participatory epistemology: A contemporary conceptualisation of Grundtvigian pedagogy.
Nylander, E., Österlund, L., Fejes, A. (2018). Exploring the adult learning research field by analysing who cites whom. Vocations and learning, 11(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12106-017-9181-z
Omidvar, O., & Kislov, R. (2014). The evolution of the communities of practice approach: Peralta, K. J. (2017). Toward a Deeper Appreciation of Participatory Epistemology in Community-based Participatory Research. PRISM: A Journal of Regional Engagement, 6 (1).
Raz, J., Korsgaard, C. M., Pippin, R. B., Williams, B. A. O. (2005). The practice of value.
Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to Communities of Practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00618.x.
Ryan, M.. (2023). Reflexive Epistemic Communities ofPractice: Enabling theProfession Through Sustainable Partnerships. In Work-Integrated Learning Case Studies in Teacher Education (pp. 3–10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6532-6_1
Sarid, A., Levanon, M. (2022). Rethinking the theory of communities of practice in education: Critical reflection and ethical imagination. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(10), 1693–1704.
Scribner, S., Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy (Vol. 198, No. 1). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674433014
Toward knowledgeability in a landscape of practice. An interview with Etienne Wenger- Trayner. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(3), 266-275.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In Blackmore, C. Social learning systems and communities of practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School. Press.
Wenger-Trayner, E. & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Learning in the landscape of practice: A Framework. In E. Wenger-Trayner et.al. (Eds.). Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777122
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Johan Lövgren
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
