NEUTRALITY IN EDUCATION: CHALLENGING THE CALL FOR TEACHER’S NEUTRALITY WITH THE CONCEPT OF JUDGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34813/09coll2026Słowa kluczowe:
teacher’s neutrality, Hannah Arendt, judgement, teacher educationAbstrakt
Starting point of this paper is the online portal Neutral Teachers, which was launched by the far-right party Alternative for Germany (AfD) to enlighten students, parents, and teachers about the principle of neutrality that civil servants have to follow. As most teachers in Germany are civil servants, the principle of neutrality applies to their positions. In a first step, the German discussion around teacher’s neutrality will be analysed with a focus on the debate about the Beutelsbach Consensus (1977), an agreement between teachers and researchers, which still has a lot of influence on how the German debate around teacher’s neutrality is conducted. This consensus is also used by the authors of Neutral Teacher to legitimate their website. In a second step, the discussion around teacher’s neutrality in the U.S.A. and Canada will be considered with reference to two different positions, which are nearly 20 years apart and illustrate an interesting shift in the debate. In the third step, Hannah Arendt’s conception of judgement will be explained with a special focus on the general standpoint and the enlarged mentality because these concepts offer a significant alternative to the call for teacher’s neutrality. The importance of judgement and its value for the teacher’s profession and a thing-centred teacher education will be outlined further in the conclusion.
Bibliografia
Agostinone-Wilson, F. (2005). Fair and Balanced to Death: Confronting the Cult of Neutrality In the Teacher Education Classroom. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 3(1). https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/jf36/eci322/fairandbalanced.pdf
Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) – Landtagsfraktion Niedersachsen. (2025). Neutrale Lehrer. https://www.neutrale-lehrer.de/
Arendt, H. (1961). The Crisis in Education. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought (Original work published 1958). The Viking Press.
Arendt, H. (1992). Lectures on Kant’s political philosophy (R. Beiner, Ed.). (Original work published 1970). The University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (2003). Personal Responsibility under Dictatorship (Original work published 1964). In J. Kohn (Ed.), Responsibility and Judgement (pp. 17-48). Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. (2017). The Origins of Totalitarianism (Original work published 1951). Penguin Classics.
Biesta, G. (2012). The future of teacher education: Evidence, competence or wisdom? Research on Steiner Education, 3(1), 8–21. http://www.rosejourn.com/index.php/rose/article/view-File/92/118
Biesta, G. (2013). Knowledge, judgement and the curriculum: On the past, present and future of the idea of “the practical”. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(5), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.798839
Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12109
Casale, R. (2022). Einführung in die Erziehungs- und Bildungsphilosophie. Brill/Schöningh.
Christensen, A. S., & Grammes, T. (2020). The Beutelsbach Consensus – The German approach to controversial issues in an international context. Acta Didactica Norden, 14(4), Article 4, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.8349
Flaherty, C. (2016): Being Watched. New website seeks to register professors accused of liberal bias and “anti-American values.” 16.11.2016. Online available: https://www.insidehigh-ered.com/news/2016/11/22/new-website-seeks-register-professors-accused-liberal-bias-and-anti-american-values
Gewerkschaft für Erziehung und Wissenschaft (GEW). (2024). Lehrkräfte müssen nicht neutral sein. https://www.gew.de/aktuelles/detailseite/lehrkraefte-muessen-nicht-neutral-sein
Gloe, M., & Oeftering, T. (2020). Didaktik der politischen Bildung: Ein Überblick über Ziele und Grundlagen inklusiver politischer Bildung. [in:] D. Meyer, W. Hilpert, & B. Lindmeier (Eds.), Grundlagen und Praxis inklusiver politischer Bildung (pp. 87–132). Bonn.
Hornblower, S. (2016). Neutrality. In T. Whitmarsh (Ed.), Oxford Classical Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.4395
Kant, I. (2008). Zum ewigen Frieden (Original work published 1795). Reclam.
Kant, I. (2017). Kritik der Urteilskraft (Original work published 1790). Suhrkamp.
Kelly, T. E. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher’s role. In Theory & Research in Social Education, 14(2), 113–38.
Klieme, E., Hartig, J., & Rauch, D. (2008). The Concept of Competence in Educational Contexts.
In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of Competencies in Educational Contexts (pp. 3–22). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Klug, J., Gerich, M., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Can teachers’ diagnostic competence be fostered through training and the use of a diary? Journal for Educational Research Online, 8(3), 184–206.
Korsgaard, M. T. (2024). Retuning Education. Bildung and Exemplarity Beyond the Logic of Progress. Routledge.
Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). (2001, 23. März). Leistungsmessungen in Schulen. Kultusministerkonferenz. https://www.kmk.org/aktuelles/artikelansicht/leistungsmessungen-in-schulen.html
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In Defence of the School. A Public Issue. Leuven.
Maxwell, B. (2023). Teacher Neutrality, Pedagogical Impartiality, and Democratic Education. In J. Culp, J. Drerup, & D. Yacek (Eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of Democratic
Education (pp. 607–627). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071536.040
OECD (2002). Definition and Selection of Competencies. DeSeCo, Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations: Strategy Paper. DEELSA/ED/CERI/CD(2009)9. https://www.deseco.ch/RychSalg_Front.pdf
Ohle, A., & McElvany, N. (2015). Teachers’ diagnostic competences and their practical relevance: Special issue editorial. Journal for Educational Research Online, 7(2), 5–10.
Polcik, T. (2024). Den „Strukturzusammenhang“ begreifen: Fragmentierung als philosophisches Problem und die Möglichkeit ihrer didaktischen Vermittlung. In A. Gräf et al. (Eds.), Fragmentierung in der Lehrkräftebildung: Das Lehramtsstudium im Spannungsfeld von Professionsorientierung, Bildungstheorie und (Fach-)Wissenschaft (pp. 183–210). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748920106
Prange, K. (1986). Bauformen des Unterrichts: Eine Didaktik für Lehrer. Julius Klinkhardt.
Rojahn, P. (2024): Urteilskraft als Kern einer pädagogisch und wissenschaftlich professionalisierenden Lehrkräftebildung. In A. Gräf et al. (Eds.), Fragmentierung in der Lehrkräftebildung: Das Lehramtsstudium im Spannungsfeld von Professionsorientierung, Bildungstheorie und (Fach-)Wissenschaft (pp. 101–116). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748920106
Rojahn, P. (2025). Hannah Arendts Pädagogik: Eine Bildungstheorie für die Lehrkräftebildung. Budrich Academic Press. https://shop.budrich.de/produkt/hannah-arendts-paedagogik/
Schneider, G., & Toyka-Seid, C. (2025). Das junge Politik-Lexikon. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. www.hanisauland.de
Schrader, F.-W., & Helmke, A. (2014). Alltägliche Leistungsbeurteilung durch Lehrer. In F. E.
Weinert (Ed.), Leistungsmessungen in Schulen (pp. 45–58). Beltz. (Original work published 2001).
Thompson, C., & Wrana, D. (2019). Zur Normativität erziehungswissenschaftlichen Wissens – drei Thesen. In: W. Meseth/R. Casale/A. Tervooren/J. Zirfas, (Eds.): Normativität in der Erziehungswissenschaft (pp. 171-182). Springer.
Trosset, C. (1998). Obstacles to open discussion and critical thinking. Change, 30(5), 44–49.
Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2019). Towards an ontology of teaching: Thing-centred pedagogy, affirmation and love for the world. Springer.
Wehling, H.-G. (1977). Konsens á la Beutelsbach? In S. Schiele & H. Schneider (Eds.), Das Konsensproblem in der politischen Bildung (pp. 179–180). Klett.
Weinert, F. E. (1999). Concepts of Competence (pp. 3–34). Contribution within the OECD Project Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations (DeSeCo). Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik.
Weinert, F. E. (2014). Vergleichende Leistungsmessung in Schulen – eine umstrittene
Selbstverständlichkeit. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Leistungsmessungen in Schulen (pp. 17–31). Beltz. (Original work published 2001).
Wieland, J. (2019). Was man sagen darf: Mythos Neutralität in Schule und Unterricht. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. https://www.bpb.de/themen/bildung/dossier-bildung/292674/was-man-sagen-darf-mythos-neutralitaet-in-schule-und-unterricht/
Wrase, M. (2020). Wie politisch dürfen Lehrkräfte sein? Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und
Perspektiven. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. https://www.bpb.de/shop/zeitschriften/apuz/306955/wie-politisch-duerfen-lehrkraefte-sein/
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Pia Rojahn
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
